[ovs-discuss] mf_value and mf_subvalue size restrictions
blp at nicira.com
Thu Nov 6 19:03:49 UTC 2014
That was fast.
Thanks, I applied this.
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:00:41AM -0800, Madhu Challa wrote:
> Agreed and looks good.
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Ben Pfaff <blp at nicira.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:34:04PM -0800, Madhu Challa wrote:
> > > The other issue was in the same file. I am glad make check catches these
> > > issues and hope there are none in other files. I attached a patch that
> > > should make it simpler to extend the union in the future.
> > I think it's better to use ARRAY_SIZE than to invent a new macro.
> > The trick with .__unused[0...15] will only work with GCC and Clang since
> > the use of ... in an initializer is a GCC extension. I think that the
> > best we can do here is to add a build assertion and a comment.
> > I posted my version, please take a look:
> > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-November/048347.html
More information about the discuss