[ovs-discuss] Bridge traffic stops flowing after ovs-vtep run
Mikhail Bagrov
mbagrov at cloudlinux.com
Mon Nov 23 17:11:50 UTC 2015
Hi. I'm trying to implement the VTEP Emulator from
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/vtep/README.ovs-vtep.md
I've built OVS from source on Centos7, trying to interconnect docker
containers between different and within a single docker node. Still no
traffic flows between containers.
I have:
[root at ovs11 ovs]# vtep-ctl list-remote-macs ls0
ucast-mac-remote
7a:2c:ba:c0:62:16 -> vxlan_over_ipv4/10.2.2.102
c2:fd:9f:ea:3f:e3 -> vxlan_over_ipv4/10.2.2.101
de:eb:3c:62:65:fc -> vxlan_over_ipv4/10.2.2.103
a mac to ip mapping table populated on each host.
[root at ovs11 ovs]# ovs-vsctl show
82434185-c196-45dd-bcf1-1260e33ceae3
Bridge vtep_bfd
Port "bfd10.2.2.101"
Interface "bfd10.2.2.101"
type: vxlan
options: {remote_ip="10.2.2.101"}
Port "bfd10.2.2.102"
Interface "bfd10.2.2.102"
type: vxlan
options: {remote_ip="10.2.2.102"}
Port "bfd10.2.2.103"
Interface "bfd10.2.2.103"
type: vxlan
options: {remote_ip="10.2.2.103"}
Port vtep_bfd
Interface vtep_bfd
type: internal
Bridge "vtep_ls1"
Port "vx2"
Interface "vx2"
type: vxlan
options: {key="0", remote_ip="10.2.2.102"}
Port "vx1"
Interface "vx1"
type: vxlan
options: {key="0", remote_ip="10.2.2.101"}
Port "0000-p0-l"
Interface "0000-p0-l"
type: patch
options: {peer="0000-p0-p"}
Port "vx3"
Interface "vx3"
type: vxlan
options: {key="0", remote_ip="10.2.2.103"}
Port "vtep_ls1"
Interface "vtep_ls1"
type: internal
Bridge "br0"
Port "p1"
Interface "p1"
Port "br0"
Interface "br0"
type: internal
Port "0000-p0-p"
Interface "0000-p0-p"
type: patch
options: {peer="0000-p0-l"}
Port "1d53fed7f9284_l"
Interface "1d53fed7f9284_l"
Port "p0"
Interface "p0"
Port "1d53fed7f9284_l" is a docker container's port.
Settings look fine, but still no traffic flows. Thanks in advance.
--
Regards, Mikhail Bagrov
DevOps at Kuberdock
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/attachments/20151123/cfa79652/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the discuss
mailing list