[ovs-discuss] help - ovs 2.5 flow statistics issues

[Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces at openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of
>awang10 at masonlive.gmu.edu
>Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:14 PM
>To: discuss at openvswitch.org
>Subject: [ovs-discuss] help - ovs 2.5 flow statistics issues
>
>Hi, All,
>
>I am running openvswitch 2.5.0 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with kernel 3.13.0-92-
>generic.
>I installed the two following rules to the switch:
>
>NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
> cookie=0x0, duration=2.183s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=2,
>priority=50000,ip,in_port=1,nw_src=10.0.0.0/8,nw_dst=81.0.0.0/8
>actions=output:2
> cookie=0x0, duration=10.829s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
>idle_age=10, in_port=1 actions=output:2
>
>Another host machine connecting to the switch generates traffic (including
>10.0.0.0/8 -> 81.0.0.0/8) that goes through the switch.
>However, the statistics were not be updated correctly with n_packets for the
>higher priority rule remaining 0 while all the traffic statistics being credited to
>the lower priority rule.
>But if I modify the rules to be:
>
>NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
> cookie=0x0, duration=2.183s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=2,
>priority=50000,ip,in_port=1,nw_src=10.0.0.0/8 actions=output:2
> cookie=0x0, duration=10.829s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0,
>idle_age=10, in_port=1 actions=output:2
>
>Then it works fine. So it seems that statistics with both nw_src and nw_dst
>matching do not work properly?

I don't see an issue matching both nw_src & nw_dst and can see the 'n_packets', 'n_bytes' entry incremented for all matching packets. I quickly verified this on master branch.

NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):
 cookie=0x0, duration=430.063s, table=0, n_packets=2109130027, n_bytes=126547801620, idle_age=9, priority=50000,ip,in_port=1,nw_src=2.0.0.0/8,nw_dst=3.0.0.0/8 actions=output:2
 cookie=0x0, duration=428.842s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=428, in_port=1 actions=output:2

Regards,
Bhanu Prakash.

 Or did I misconfigure something?
>I'd really appreciate your help!
>
>Thanks,
>An