[ovs-discuss] Why is OVS patch used instead of veth pairs to connect OVS bridges?
dragos.ilie at bth.se
Sun Feb 7 10:12:35 UTC 2016
The explanation I've seen is that the OVS /patch/ interface is optimized
for OpenvSwitch. I would like to understand what is being optimized.
I've seen a reply on the OVS mailing list that says OVS /patch/ ports
are implemented entirely inside OVS userspace. I don't understand how
this is done without a performance penalty. I've thought that as soon a
VM sends a packet to its vNIC, the packet will cross from user space to
kernel space over the TAP interface. Eventually the packet reaches the
OVS bridge (br-int, for example). If at that point the packet must be
sent to next OVS bridge over a /patch/ port, does it mean it crosses
back to user space? That would incur a performance hit.
I am hypothesizing that perhaps the /patch/ port is just a configuration
construct to tell the OVS kernel module that the ports on two OVS
bridges are connected. Then, somehow the kernel module is able to
forward the packets between the two bridges more efficiently than over a
/veth/ pair. It would be nice if somebody can confirm if this is the
correct explanation or if there is a better one.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss