[ovs-discuss] [ovn] ovn-trace ct_actions not implemented

[Michael Kashin]

OK, had a look at the source code of ovn-trace and it looks like ,indeed,
none of the conntrack actions are implemented yet.
Should it read as "not yet" or "will not" be implemented?

On 28 Nov 2016 9:28 p.m., "Michael Kashin" <mmkashin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I'm having issues running ovn-trace for anything other than L2 flow. I
> have OVN+Neutron and a small topology with 3 VMs working fine (both nb and
> sb DBs are populated). whenever i do a trace for a L2 flow (only specify
> inport, eth.src and eth.dst) I see the expected result. Whenever I do a L3
> flow trace I always get the following error:
>
> [root at controller-1 ~]# ovn-trace  ed728b49-d632-4bdb-a65c-804311a3fea4
> 'inport=="26c23a54-6a91-48fd-a019-3bd8a7e118de" && eth.src ==
> fa:16:3e:4f:2f:b8 && eth.dst == fa:16:3e:0d:df:ea && ip4.src == 10.0.0.2 &&
> ip4.dst == 20.0.0.1 && ip.ttl == 32'
> 2016-11-28T21:21:49Z|00001|ovntrace|WARN|reg0[3] = put_dhcp_opts(offerip
> = 20.0.0.9, netmask = 255.255.255.0, router = 20.0.0.1, mtu = 1442,
> server_id = 20.0.0.1, lease_time = 43200); next;: parsing actions failed
> (Syntax error at `offerip' expecting DHCPv4 option name.)
> 2016-11-28T21:21:49Z|00002|ovntrace|WARN|reg0[3] = put_dhcp_opts(offerip
> = 10.0.0.5, netmask = 255.255.255.0, router = 10.0.0.1, mtu = 1442,
> server_id = 10.0.0.1, lease_time = 43200); next;: parsing actions failed
> (Syntax error at `offerip' expecting DHCPv4 option name.)
> 2016-11-28T21:21:49Z|00003|ovntrace|WARN|reg0[3] = put_dhcp_opts(offerip
> = 10.0.0.2, netmask = 255.255.255.0, router = 10.0.0.1, mtu = 1442,
> server_id = 10.0.0.1, lease_time = 43200); next;: parsing actions failed
> (Syntax error at `offerip' expecting DHCPv4 option name.)
> # ip,reg14=0x2,vlan_tci=0x0000,dl_src=fa:16:3e:4f:2f:b8,dl_
> dst=fa:16:3e:0d:df:ea,nw_src=10.0.0.2,nw_dst=20.0.0.1,nw_
> proto=0,nw_tos=0,nw_ecn=0,nw_ttl=32
>
> ingress(dp="neutron-7ee25b49-7803-497b-b8d2-7f0ed0106e29",
> inport="26c23a54-6a91-48fd-a019-3bd8a7e118de")
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------
>  0. ls_in_port_sec_l2 (ovn-northd.c:2827): inport ==
> "26c23a54-6a91-48fd-a019-3bd8a7e118de" && eth.src == {fa:16:3e:4f:2f:b8},
> priority 50
>     next(1);
>  1. ls_in_port_sec_ip (ovn-northd.c:1974): inport ==
> "26c23a54-6a91-48fd-a019-3bd8a7e118de" && eth.src == fa:16:3e:4f:2f:b8 &&
> ip4.src == {10.0.0.2}, priority 90
>     next(2);
>  3. ls_in_pre_acl (ovn-northd.c:2245): ip, priority 100
>     reg0[0] = 1;
>     next(4);
>  5. ls_in_pre_stateful (ovn-northd.c:2363): reg0[0] == 1, priority 100
>     ct_next;
>     *** ct_* actions not implemented
>
> Apologies if it's something stupid but I don't see it.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/attachments/20161129/da43047d/attachment.html>