[ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed
james.page at ubuntu.com
Tue Aug 29 09:41:50 UTC 2017
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 00:08 Ben Pfaff <blp at ovn.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:26:38PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote:
> > From: <ovs-discuss-bounces at openvswitch.org> on behalf of James Page <
> james.page at ubuntu.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 2:49 AM
> > To: "bugs at openvswitch.org" <bugs at openvswitch.org>
> > Subject: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212
> 1213 1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed
> > Hi
> > I'm cutting builds from branch-2.8 in preparation for the ovs 2.8.0
> release for Ubuntu; we build and test two sets of binaries - a vanilla one
> and one with dpdk enabled.
> > I see test failures on all of the "ofproto-dpif - conntrack" tests with
> the DPDK build and with the ovn ACL test (see attached logs). Vanilla
> build is fine.
> > James
> > These are generic tests and should not be run with-dpdk set.
> > If you run these tests --with-dpdk, some tests will consider the packets
> coming an actual dpdk interface, which they are not.
> > In this case, the packets will be marked with a bad checksum.
> All of the tests in the testsuite should always pass, or be skipped,
> regardless of configuration, so if some of the tests are inappropriate
> for a given configuration then they need AT_SKIP_IF([...]) to ensure
> that they get skipped.
Glad to hear that - as part of the vanilla and DPDK binary builds, we run
the complete test suite with both sets of binaries; the smaller the sauce
we have to apply in the execution of the tests for the DPDK build the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the discuss