[ovs-discuss] max mega flow 64k per pmd or per dpcls?
bhanuprakash.bodireddy at intel.com
Fri Jun 30 09:19:01 UTC 2017
>Sorry I am a bit confused about the EMC occupied size per PMD, here has a
Initially EMC had 1024 entries and the patch  increased it to 8k. By doing so in simple test
scenarios, most of the flows will hit EMC and we can achieve wire speed for smaller packets.
With this patch the EMC cache size is now @ ~4MB.
It should be noted that there can be multiple PMD threads and whole lot of other threads running
on the compute. Cache is limited and all the threads contend for LLC resources. This leads to cache thrashing
and impacts performance.
To alleviate this problem, Intel's (Resource Director Technology) RDT is used to partition the LLC and
assign cache ways to different threads based on priority.
>Do you mean in real scenarios OVS-DPDK can be memory bound on EMC?
OvS is flexible and results are use case dependent. With some use cases , EMC quickly gets saturated and packets will be sent to classifier.
Some of the bottlenecks I referred are in classifier. .
>I thought EMC should be totally fit in LLC.
As pointed earlier there may be lot of threads on the compute and this assumption may not be right always.
>If the megaflows just part in LLC, then the cost of copy between memory and
>LLC should be large, isn't it not like what defined as 'fast path' in userspace
>compared with kernel datapath? And if most of megaflows are in memory,
>the reason of every PMD has one dpcls instance is to follow the rule PMD
>thread should has local data as most as it can, but not every PMD put it in its
>local cache, if that is true, I can't see why 64k is the limit num, unless this is an
>experience best value calculated from vtune/perf resutls.
>You are probably enabled hyper-thread with 35MB and got 28 cores.
I have E5-2695 v3, dual socket with 14 cores per socket. I will have 56 cores with HT enabled.
>On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Bodireddy, Bhanuprakash
><bhanuprakash.bodireddy at intel.com> wrote:
>>I guess the answer is now the general LLC is 2.5M per core so that there is
>>flows per thread.
>AFAIK, the no. of flows here may not have to do anything with LLC. Also there
>is EMC cache(8k entries) of ~4MB per PMD thread.
>Yes the performance will be nice with simple test cases (P2P with 1 PMD
>thread) as most of this fits in to LLC. But in real scenarios OvS-DPDK can be
>BTW, on my DUT the LLC is 35MB and has 28 cores and so the assumption of
>2.5M/core isn't right.
>>On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Hui Xiang <xianghuir at gmail.com> wrote:
>>Why not allocating 64k for each dpcls? does the 64k just fit in L3 cache or
>>anywhere? how it is calculated in such an exact number? If there are more
>>ports added for polling, for avoid competing can I increase the 64k size into a
>>bigger one? Thanks.
More information about the discuss