[ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] adding dpdk ports sharing same pci address to ovs-dpdk bridge

Darrell Ball dball at vmware.com
Tue Sep 19 15:48:07 UTC 2017



On 9/19/17, 8:22 AM, "Loftus, Ciara" <ciara.loftus at intel.com> wrote:

    > On 09/19/2017 08:58 AM, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
    
    > >> Thanks for confirming Devendra
    
    > >>
    
    > >> Adding Ciara
    
    > >> There have been some offline discussions regarding the issue.
    
    > >
    
    > > The workaround discussed is a patch to enable backwards compatibility
    
    > with the old port IDs. Something like the following:
    
    > >
    
    > > – set Interface portX options:dpdk-devargs=dpdkportid0
    
    > >
    
    > > Looking for input.
    
    > >
    
    > 
    
    > Seems like a good idea to take in the port number as a workaround. If
    
    > it's just temporary because there will be a fix in DPDK sometime, then
    
    > perhaps a new experimental option could be introduced  (e.g.
    
    > dpdk-legacyname or dpdk-dpdkportnum) and removed in time. Otherwise
    
    > dpdk-devargs usage will be changing between releases, break backwards
    
    > compatibility and probably confuse people migrating from <OVS 2.7 by
    
    > having two ways to use it.
    
    > 
    
    > Maybe =dpdk0 is better than =dpdkportid0 as it's closer to the old
    
    > behavior you are trying to replicate?
    
    > 
    
    > set Interface mydpdkport options:dpdk-legacyname=dpdk0
    
    
    
    I think that's a good approach.


Seems fine to me
One alternative since I remember there was some confusion about the portid context before.

dpdk-dpdkportid=dpdk0  ?
    
    
    > 
    
    > Do you know if the required API will be implemented in DPDK sometime?
    
    
    
    There was no response when I cross-posted to DPDK users mailing list, so I can't confirm.
    
    
    
    Thanks,
    
    Ciara
    
    
    
    > 
    
    > > Thanks,
    
    > > Ciara
    
    > >
    
    > >>
    
    > >>
    
    > >> From: devendra rawat <devendra.rawat.singh at gmail.com>
    
    > >> Date: Monday, September 18, 2017 at 4:27 AM
    
    > >> To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
    
    > >> Cc: Darrel Ball <dball at vmware.com>, "ovs-dev at openvswitch.org" <ovs-
    
    > >> dev at openvswitch.org>, "discuss at openvswitch.org"
    
    > >> <discuss at openvswitch.org>
    
    > >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] adding dpdk ports sharing same pci address to ovs-
    
    > >> dpdk bridge
    
    > >>
    
    > >> Hi Kevin,
    
    > >>
    
    > >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Traynor <ktraynor at redhat.com>
    
    > >> wrote:
    
    > >> On 09/07/2017 06:47 PM, Darrell Ball wrote:
    
    > >>> Adding discuss at openvswitch.org
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>> The related changes went into 2.7
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>> On 9/7/17, 3:51 AM, "ovs-dev-bounces at openvswitch.org on behalf of
    
    > >> devendra rawat" <ovs-dev-bounces at openvswitch.org on behalf of
    
    > >> devendra.rawat.singh at gmail.com> wrote:
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      Hi,
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      I have compiled and built ovs-dpdk using DPDK v17.08 and OVS v2.8.0.
    
    > >> The
    
    > >>>      NIC that I am using is Mellanox ConnectX-3 Pro, which is a dual port
    
    > 10G
    
    > >>>      NIC. The problem with this NIC is that it provides only one PCI address
    
    > for
    
    > >>>      both the 10G ports.
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      So when I am trying to add the two DPDK ports to my br0 bridge
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      # ovs-vsctl --no-wait add-port br0 dpdk0 -- set Interface dpdk0
    
    > >> type=dpdk
    
    > >>>      options:dpdk-devargs=0002:01:00.0
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      # ovs-vsctl --no-wait add-port br0 dpdk1 -- set Interface dpdk1
    
    > >> type=dpdk
    
    > >>>      options:dpdk-devargs=0002:01:00.0
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>
    
    > >> Were you able to confirm those addresses by running ./dpdk-devbind.py
    
    > -s
    
    > >> in your <dpdk_src>/tools dir?
    
    > >>
    
    > >> On running dpdk-devbind.py --status , I can see the ConnectX-3 pro NIC,
    
    > >> having only one PCI address.
    
    > >>
    
    > >> Network devices using DPDK-compatible driver
    
    > >> ============================================
    
    > >> <none>
    
    > >>
    
    > >> Network devices using kernel driver
    
    > >> ===================================
    
    > >> 0002:01:00.0 'MT27520 Family [ConnectX-3 Pro] 1007'
    
    > >> if=enP4p1s0d1,enP4p1s0 drv=mlx4_core unused=
    
    > >> 0006:01:00.0 'I210 Gigabit Network Connection 1533' if=enP6p1s0 drv=igb
    
    > >> unused= *Active*
    
    > >>
    
    > >>>      The port dpdk1 is added successfully and able to transfer data, but
    
    > adding
    
    > >>>      dpdk0 to br0 fails:
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      2017-09-06T14:19:20Z|00045|netdev_dpdk|INFO|Port 0:
    
    > >> e4:1d:2d:4f:78:60
    
    > >>>      2017-09-06T14:19:20Z|00046|bridge|INFO|bridge br0: added
    
    > interface
    
    > >> dpdk1 on
    
    > >>>      port 1
    
    > >>>      2017-09-06T14:19:20Z|00047|bridge|INFO|bridge br0: added
    
    > interface
    
    > >> br0 on
    
    > >>>      port 65534
    
    > >>>      2017-09-06T14:19:20Z|00048|dpif_netlink|WARN|Generic Netlink
    
    > family
    
    > >>>      'ovs_datapath' does not exist. The Open vSwitch kernel module is
    
    > >> probably
    
    > >>>      not loaded.
    
    > >>>      2017-09-06T14:19:20Z|00049|netdev_dpdk|WARN|'dpdk0' is trying to
    
    > >> use device
    
    > >>>      '0002:01:00.0' which is already in use by 'dpdk1'
    
    > >>>      2017-09-06T14:19:20Z|00050|netdev|WARN|dpdk0: could not set
    
    > >> configuration
    
    > >>>      (Address already in use)
    
    > >>>      2017-09-06T14:19:20Z|00051|bridge|INFO|bridge br0: using datapath
    
    > ID
    
    > >>>      0000e41d2d4f7860
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      With OVS v2.6.1 I never had this problem as dpdk-devargs was not
    
    > >> mandatory
    
    > >>>      and just specifying port name was enough to add that port to bridge.
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      Is there a way to add port both ports to bridge ?
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>      Thanks,
    
    > >>>      Devendra
    
    > >>>      _______________________________________________
    
    > >>>      dev mailing list
    
    > >>>      dev at openvswitch.org
    
    > >>>      https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
    
    > >> 3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-
    
    > >> 2Ddev&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-
    
    > >> uZnsw&m=qO7NdgrrorJhievOguQLmsfEFuBcPfz9NfQX7UME1-
    
    > >> 8&s=ZKHbYlaTjm8VFj6Rggmcb2gw6s3xW4PxEtUy4YFG1VA&e=
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>>
    
    > >>> _______________________________________________
    
    > >>> dev mailing list
    
    > >>> dev at openvswitch.org
    
    > >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.openvswitch.org_mailman_listinfo_ovs-2Ddev&d=DwIGaQ&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=BVhFA09CGX7JQ5Ih-uZnsw&m=v4-bnt_GgJMPjPJl9_1OlLoYoqUsCCzOasQLj7GBwpw&s=R-ykOh4W_M35mFTDTbf7g0EMxO_ybUi5t600GLqdMo8&e= 
    
    > >>>
    
    > >
    
    
    
    



More information about the discuss mailing list