[ovs-discuss] How about give a simplify kernel version OVS used in Docker network?

Sam batmanustc at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 02:38:05 UTC 2018


In docker classic enviroment, 16 VM instance.

Sam <batmanustc at gmail.com> 于2018年11月15日周四 上午10:33写道:

> May be I mistake, my test result is:
> to reach line speed of 10G port(Intel 10G NIC), I use 8 core for linux
> bridge, and I have to use 10 core for ovs.
> Same scene.
>
> I don't know who have some test result, or official test report?
>
> Guru Shetty <guru at ovn.org> 于2018年11月15日周四 上午1:24写道:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 21:53, Sam <batmanustc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And why OVS take high CPU cost?
>>>
>>
>> My simplistic guess is that you have created a loop in your network with
>> OVS. Or your SDN flows are inefficient. For a simple setup, there should
>> really be not much difference with CPU between linux bridge and OVS.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Sam <batmanustc at gmail.com> 于2018年11月14日周三 下午1:51写道:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> When I'm using Docker network, I choose linux bridge, as OVS will take
>>>> high CPU cost. I think most user will encounter this problem.
>>>>
>>>> But also I want to use openflow and SDN. So how about give a simplify
>>>> kernel version OVS used in Docker network ?
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at openvswitch.org
>>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-discuss/attachments/20181115/a4fa279b/attachment.html>


More information about the discuss mailing list