[ovs-discuss] ovs-ofctl fails occasionally
Ken Ajiro
ken-ajiro at xr.jp.nec.com
Fri Mar 1 04:45:22 UTC 2019
Ben,
> The following stopgap appears to fix the problem on master. I suspect
> it could be easily backported as far as necessary. Does it work for you
> too?
Yes, it worked. Thank you for your support.
Thanks,
Ken
On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:12:54 +0000,
blp at ovn.org wrote
in E-mail "Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-ofctl fails occasionally":
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:45:58PM +0000, Ken Ajiro wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > When I use ovs-ofctl on OVS 2.10.1, it failed occasionally by error:
> >
> > ovs-ofctl: br0: failed to connect to socket (Broken pipe)
> >
> > This error is possible to be reproduced with:
> >
> > # while :; do /opt/nec/pf/ds/bin/ovs-ofctl --timeout=5 dump-flows br0 > /tmp/log || break; done; cat /tmp/log
> > ovs-ofctl: br0: failed to connect to socket (Broken pipe)
> >
> > Also I tried with OVS 2.4.1 and could not reproduce this error.
> >
> > I think that recently rconn.c was modified on commit 476d2551abd2871696a64203f78d658ac2d7f32c
> > and the connection for ofctl was changed it begins on state S_CONNECTING instead of S_ACTIVE.
> > So timeout_CONNECTING will be applied for ofctl connection, however timeout_CONNECTING is 1
> > and this is too short (e.g. if transition time of CONNCTING was 12:00:00.999, it will be timed out
> > after 1ms). I think that this is cause of occasionally disconnection of ofctl.
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> It seems to me that the right long-term fix is to use higher resolution
> (e.g. millisecond resolution) to measure the timeouts. However, that
> will be a relatively large fix.
>
> The following stopgap appears to fix the problem on master. I suspect
> it could be easily backported as far as necessary. Does it work for you
> too?
>
> diff --git a/lib/rconn.c b/lib/rconn.c
> index 48ae8c6a72e5..8ca23cbcfe90 100644
> --- a/lib/rconn.c
> +++ b/lib/rconn.c
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static unsigned int
> timeout_CONNECTING(const struct rconn *rc)
> OVS_REQUIRES(rc->mutex)
> {
> - return MAX(1, rc->backoff);
> + return MAX(2, rc->backoff);
> }
>
> static void
More information about the discuss
mailing list