[ovs-discuss] OVS DPDK: Failed to create memory pool for netdev

Tobias Hofmann (tohofman) tohofman at cisco.com
Wed Nov 6 13:44:27 UTC 2019

Hi Flavio,

the only error I saw in 'ovs-vsctl show' was related to the dpdk port. The other ports all came up fine.

Regarding the "ring error", I'm fine with having it, as long as DPDK is able to reserve the minimum amount of memory (which, after restarting OvS process is always the case).


On 05.11.19, 21:07, "Flavio Leitner" <fbl at sysclose.org> wrote:

    On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:47:09 +0000
    "Tobias Hofmann \(tohofman\) via discuss" <ovs-discuss at openvswitch.org>
    > Hi Flavio,
    > thanks for the insights! Unfortunately, I don't know about the pdump
    > and its relation to the ring.
    pdump dumps packets from dpdk ports into rings/mempools, so that you
    can inspect/use the traffic:
    But I looked at the dpdk sources now and I don't see it allocating any
    memory when the library is initialized, so this is likely a red herring.
    > Can you please specify where I can see that the port is not ready
    > yet? Is that these three lines:
    > 2019-11-02T14:14:23.094Z|00070|dpdk|ERR|EAL: Cannot find unplugged
    > device (0000:08:0b.2)
    The above shows the device is not ready/bound yet.
    > 2019-11-02T14:14:23.094Z|00071|netdev_dpdk|WARN|Error attaching
    > device '0000:08:0b.2' to DPDK
    > 2019-11-02T14:14:23.094Z|00072|netdev|WARN|dpdk-p0: could not set
    > configuration (Invalid argument)
    > As far as I know, the ring allocation failure that you mentioned
    > isn't necessarily a bad thing since it just indicates that DPDK
    > reduces something internally (I can't remember what exactly it was)
    > to support a high MTU with only 1GB of memory.
    True for the memory allocated for DPDK ports. However, there is a
    minimum which if it's not there, the mempool allocation will fail.
    > I'm wondering now if it might help to change the timing of when
    > openvswitch is started after a system reboot to prevent this problem
    > as it only occurs after reboot. Do you think that this approach might
    > fix the problem?
    It will help to get the i40e port working, but that "ring error"
    will continue as you see after restarting anyways.
    I don't know the other interface types, maybe there is another
    interface failing which is not in the log. Do you see any error
    reported in 'ovs-vsctl show' after the restart?

More information about the discuss mailing list